You Do The Maths

I have been provided this by Tim Thomas. In fact I am considering renaming this blog View From the Tim…..

The cost of the Public Defender Service

The Cost of Employing a Junior at PDS per year

Salary = £90,000 per year for a 37 hour week 40.5 days leave and privilege days

Pension contribution = £21,600

NI contribution = £11,629

Practising Certificate etc= £831.68

Clothing (bands etc) = £200

Personal expenses = £650

Archbold = £450

Total = £125,360.68

Cost of Employing a Self-Employed junior to work on a VHCC full time for a year on a Category 2 case with the same number of hours preparation as Operation Cotton

Say the trial preparation takes 8 months (ie 1080 hours) to prepare and 4 months in court. To pay a self-employed Junior to do the same work done by a PDS Junior would cost1:

New Rates (cut by 1/3)

£51.10 x 1080 (prep) = £55,188 £176 x 80 (trial of 4 months) = £14,080 = £69,268

( Old Rates £73 x 1080 = £78,840 , £252 x 80(trial of 4 months) = £20,160 = £99,000)

Conclusions

On New Rates (cut by 1/3) It costs taxpayers £56,092.83 more to employ a PDS Junior to do a Category 2 VHCC than to get a self-employed Junior to do it. Whilst the PDS Junior has a salary of £90,000, the self-employed advocate has to pay his own expenses (Chambers rent, pension, travel, clerks fees, admin support, clothing, insurance etc, computer) out of his fee, making the equivalent salary at least 35% less – about £45,000, to do the most demanding and complicated fraud and terrorism cases.

On Old Rates it costs taxpayers £26,360.68 more to employ a PDS Junior to do a Category 2 VHCC

Since most VHCCs are Category 3 where the new hourly rate is £42 per hour for a self-employed junior the employment of a PDS junior to do VHCCs is even worse value for money – £42 x 1080(prep)= £45,360, £176 x 80 (trial of 4 months) = £14,080 = £59,440 . Thus the PDS Junior costs the Taypayer £65,920.68 than to get self-employed Junior to do it.

2 thoughts on “You Do The Maths

  1. kate mallison

    This reinforces my view that Grayling will pay any price to “get the Lawyers under control”. And the cost to society will be his dreadful legacy.

    Like

    Reply
  2. Pingback: Lord Chancellor “neutral” in legal aid row | JonMack

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s