The first rule of PTPH Club is “don’t adjourn PTPH Club.”

So today I did my first digital PTPH. It was the first PTPH in the list. It was, it transpired, the first digital PTPH that the Judge had conducted. 

It did not go well. 

Somewhat confusingly my solicitors had been served with a set of papers. And by that I mean actual paper papers. This was something of a fortunate mistake as they had not been invited to the case by the court, so I had not been invited to the case by anyone. 

The defendant had been sent to the Crown Court on three matters. Two of the matters had only been sent by the lower court yesterday. Only one case appeared on the list. So I liaised with the ever helpful staff and who rooted out the new cases and invited me to the party (at 10:32 am, with the list starting at 10:30). 

I had conducted my videolink conference between 10.11 and 10.26.

Undeterred I gave it go. At 10:38 I had reached a dead end. The first problem was one of the digital cupboards was bare. Nothing. Not a digital sausage. No papers had been uploaded to it. The second problem was that the file which contained the PTPH form had been uploaded as a “read only PDF”. This meant I could not add my bit to it, even if I wanted to. 

I told the Judge my difficulties. He tapped away at his laptop and confirmed everything I had told him (which was reassuring, but, as the Judge gave me the times I had been invited etc. it did make me feel like Big Brother was watching me).

So we adjourned for a fortnight. 

These are teething problems. The system itself can work. My principle criticism at the moment is you cannot duplicate and amend documents “live” so they have to be downloaded and uploaded. And users of iPads need to be aware of the limitations of their current PDF viewer. 

I do have reservations about the timing of the PTPH. I understand the theory behind it. I understand the intention that this is going to produce earlier resolution of matters and cut down hearings. It may be better expressed as a hope. I just cannot see it happening. My worry is that we are going to end up with more trials being listed, rather than less. I see a short term hope that less work is going to have to be done by fully preparing less cases is just going to mean more cases are fully prepared that then go on to be trials. 

The PTPH should happen after a lot more work is done. A timetable such as today are obviously not conducive to getting the case resolved. I am not convinced that 28 days is enough either. 

Less haste, more efficiency, to adulterate a well known phrase or saying. And whilst we get over the teething problems, there may be a need to break the first rule of PTPH Club quite a lot.

3 thoughts on “PTPH Club

  1. Ciaran Rankin

    My proposal – which obviously was ignored – was; Fix date 2 months after sending. Enough time to get all the papers served. Conference and proper advice given. Discussion with other side about pleas etc probation told about pleas and PSR on that basis. In theory all wrapped up with one hearing. But why would they listen to someone who does the job?


  2. Mark Barrington

    Another excellent post, thank you.

    Like any computer system, rubbish in, is (alas) rubbish out! … Having toiled and gnashed teeth on delivering the DCS as a functioning system, transforming the culture and business processes of the CJS from paper to digital, we were never going to land this overnight. Be rest assured that the CJS agencies are working hard to bed-down the digital business processes to make the most of this brave new world of instant availability, online 24/7, collaborative working, mobile access digital CJS we now find ourselves in.

    A glimmer of hope on the horizon that this will get better, my DCS team are working hard on an online editable webform version of the PTPH form (as reported in the BCM Newsletters) and will be available in early March, so the ‘read only’ PDF version uploaded to the DCS as part of this blog will be a thing of the past. Look out for the PTPH “Green Button” in the ‘Update Bundle View’ on a DCS case near you soon!

    Mark Barrington (@Fender_Boots)



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s